Donald Trump’s Early Presidency: Navigating Historic Unpopularity and Public Backlash

As President Donald Trump embarks on his second term, the initial days

have proven to be a tumultuous period marked by unprecedented challenges

to his popularity and governance. Despite securing a victory in the November

2024 elections and claiming the “popular” vote in several key battleground states,

Trump’s presidency has begun under a cloud of historic unpopularity,

setting the stage for a contentious and closely watched administration.

An Unexpectedly Rocky Start
When Donald Trump was inaugurated on January 20, 2025, expectations were high among his supporters who anticipated a swift and decisive implementation of his campaign promises. However, just eleven days into his presidency, it has become evident that Trump’s leadership is facing significant hurdles that have shaken his initial standing.

Gallup Poll: Record-Low Approval Ratings
A recent Gallup poll has illuminated the depth of President Trump’s unpopularity, revealing that his initial job approval rating stands at a mere 47%. Megan Brenan, a senior editor involved in the research, highlighted the historical significance of these findings:

“At 47%, President Donald Trump’s initial job approval rating for his second term is similar to the inaugural 45% reading during his first term, again placing him below all other elected presidents dating back to 1953.”

Brenan added:

“Trump remains the only elected president with sub-50% initial approval ratings, and his latest disapproval rating (48%) is three percentage points higher than in 2017.”

This data positions Trump as an anomaly among U.S. presidents. Historically, presidents enjoy a “honeymoon period” with robust approval ratings that typically wane as their administration progresses. John F. Kennedy remains the most popular modern president at the start of his term, followed by Dwight Eisenhower and Barack Obama, who achieved 68% approval in 2009. Trump’s sub-50% approval ratings, coupled with a rising disapproval rate, indicate a significant departure from presidential norms.

The Anomaly of Trump’s Approval Ratings
The Gallup poll underscores a critical divergence in Trump’s approval ratings compared to his predecessors. Unlike most presidents, who see a gradual decline in support, Trump’s initial ratings are not only low but also paired with increasing disapproval. Brenan explains:

“Most presidents have experienced a ‘honeymoon period’, with strong job approval ratings in the initial months of their presidencies that then fade as time passes.”

However, Trump defies this trend:

“Initial evaluations of Trump differ [from other presidents] in that Americans are much more likely to disapprove of his performance rather than have no opinion.”

This persistent disapproval suggests deeper undercurrents of dissatisfaction and polarization within the American electorate, raising questions about the administration’s early policies and public perception.

Celebrity Exodus: High-Profile Figures Leave the U.S.
The administration’s controversial policies have not only affected average citizens but have also prompted high-profile celebrities to reconsider their residency in the United States. Among the first to voice their intentions to leave is actress Eva Longoria. Speaking to Marie Claire, Longoria shared her concerns:

“If he keeps his promises, it’s going to be a scary place. I’m privileged,” she added. “I get to escape and go somewhere. Most Americans aren’t so lucky. They’re going to be stuck in this dystopian country, and my anxiety and sadness is for them.”

Similarly, television host Ellen DeGeneres and her wife, Portia de Rossi, have relocated to the United Kingdom. An anonymous source close to the couple told The Wrap:

“They are living in the Cotswolds and have no intention of heading back to America, particularly not while Trump remains in charge.”

These departures by beloved figures amplify the narrative of growing unease and dissatisfaction among prominent Americans, further illustrating the societal divisions exacerbated by Trump’s policies.

Public Sentiment: A Nation Divided
Trump’s early presidency has intensified the existing political and social divides within the United States. Supporters laud his commitment to reversing what they perceive as excessive “woke” policies, emphasizing a return to traditional values and military strength. Critics, however, argue that his administration’s actions undermine social progress and foster an environment of fear and exclusion.

The Polarized Public
The significant drop in approval ratings, combined with rising disapproval, reflects a populace grappling with deep-seated concerns about the direction of the country. Issues such as immigration policies, economic strategies, and social justice have become focal points of contention, contributing to the polarized atmosphere.

Economic and Social Implications
Trump’s policies, particularly those aimed at dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, have far-reaching implications. By reallocating resources away from social programs and towards traditional military and economic priorities, the administration signals a shift in focus that could reshape the socio-economic landscape.

Military and Defense
The emphasis on traditional warfighting capabilities over DEI initiatives aims to bolster the military’s operational readiness. Proponents argue that this focus enhances efficiency and effectiveness, ensuring that resources are directed towards core defense objectives. However, detractors contend that ignoring DEI can lead to decreased morale, hindered innovation, and potential ethical concerns within the armed forces.

“Eliminating DEI initiatives is a step backward for the military and for our country. Inclusivity and diversity are strengths, not weaknesses,” asserted Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT).

Conversely, supporters believe that focusing solely on military readiness will create a more disciplined and unified force, free from what they perceive as unnecessary politicization.

Immigration and Global Relations
Trump’s stringent immigration policies, including mass deportations and restrictions on asylum seekers, have strained relations with neighboring countries and impacted immigrant communities. The departure of celebrities like Eva Longoria and Ellen DeGeneres symbolizes a broader discontent among those who feel marginalized by these policies, potentially leading to increased social unrest and international criticism.

“President Trump’s decisive action is a bold step in restoring order and security at our borders,” stated Senator John Cornyn (R-TX).

Economic Policies
The administration’s economic strategies prioritize deregulation and support for traditional industries, aiming to stimulate growth and reduce governmental intervention. While these policies may benefit certain sectors, they risk exacerbating income inequality and neglecting the needs of underrepresented communities, further deepening societal divides.

“Removing millions of workers would cripple industries and devastate local economies that rely on their labor and contributions,” stated an Economic Analyst from the Brookings Institution.

Legal and Ethical Implications
Trump’s aggressive policy shifts raise significant legal and ethical questions, particularly concerning the balance between executive authority and legislative oversight.

Legal Challenges
The renaming of military bases and the elimination of DEI programs may face legal challenges from those who argue that these actions violate existing laws or infringe upon the rights of service members. Courts could be called upon to determine the legality of reversing policies implemented under previous administrations, especially those that were part of broader legislative efforts to promote diversity and inclusion.

“The administration’s attempts to reverse established policies may not hold up under judicial scrutiny, particularly if they are seen as infringing on the rights and protections afforded to individuals under federal law,” noted Professor Linda Garcia, Constitutional Law Expert at Georgetown University.

Ethical Considerations
From an ethical standpoint, the rollback of DEI programs and the restoration of traditional base names are seen by many as regressive steps that fail to acknowledge and address historical injustices. Critics argue that these actions perpetuate divisions and fail to promote a respectful and inclusive environment within the military and other government institutions.

“Ethically, the decision to revert to Confederate names ignores the painful legacy of racism and division they represent,” stated Dr. Emily Thompson, Human Rights Advocate.

The Path Forward: Balancing Tradition and Progress
As the Trump administration continues to implement its policy agenda, the challenge lies in balancing the preservation of traditional values and military readiness with the need for progress and inclusivity. Achieving this balance requires thoughtful consideration of the long-term implications of policy changes and their impact on both the military and broader society.

Integrating Operational Efficiency with Inclusivity
While the administration prioritizes combat readiness and operational efficiency, it is essential to recognize that diversity and inclusion can enhance team dynamics and overall effectiveness. Diverse teams bring a variety of perspectives and problem-solving approaches, which can be invaluable in high-stakes military operations. Finding ways to integrate inclusivity without compromising on the core objectives of military readiness could provide a more holistic approach to defense policy.

Addressing Historical Legacies with Sensitivity
Reverting the names of military bases associated with Confederate generals has ignited debates about historical memory and its role in contemporary society. Moving forward, it will be crucial for the administration to address these historical legacies with sensitivity and a commitment to fostering an environment that honors all service members’ contributions. This includes engaging in open dialogues about the significance of these symbols and their impact on the military community.