People are starting to see how Trump’s revocation of the Equal Employment Opportunity influenced workers

Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony was marked by tradition, the presence of established political figures. But also with a number of executive actions reflecting his administration’s priorities. The new president signed 25 executive orders on the day he took office, and a particular one stood out – the revocation of Executive Order 11246, known as Equal Employment Opportunity.

This order, which was signed by former President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, has served as a key policy in preventing discrimination in federal employment while ensuring equal opportunities for all.

It bans discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin thus obliges federal contractors to adopt diversity-focused affirmative action plans.

Revoking the Equal Employment Opportunity order doesn’t mean discrimination is now legal. However, it certainly means it is a step toward weakening defenses against racism and other biases.
Trump spoke openly about his plan to revoke the Equal Employment Order before heading to the White House. He said it was necessary to backpedal DEI programs because they are “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral.”

Trump, and other republicans, believe the DEI policies (diversity, equity, and inclusion) disadvantage people in majority groups in an unfair way.

Just so things are clear: this was an awful EO but it does NOT make discrimination legal. The CRA is still the law of the land. Trump wants us to think he has the power to make laws go away. He does not. EOs don’t do that.

While revoking the order, Trump can’t revoke the Equal Employment Opportunity Act since it represents a law that was passed by Congress and signed by former president Richard Nixon in 1972.

Nonetheless, Trump’s action triggered criticism.
“Good for straight white males. Bad for everyone else,” someone posted on the social media.

Basil Smikle Jr, a political strategist and policy advisor, commented: “There’s this clear effort to hinder, if not erode, the political and economic power of people of color and women.

“What it does is opens up the door for more cronyism.”

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Related Posts

A Moment of Embarrassment That Turned Into an Unexpected Lifeline

The day my debit card failed at the grocery store is one I won’t forget—not because of the embarrassment, but because of what followed. At 72, I…

Timeless Legends: The Icons Who Continue to Shape Entertainment Across a Century

In a time when trends come and go at lightning speed, a rare group of performers continues to rise above the noise—artists whose careers stretch across nearly…

How to Make Bananas Work Better for Your Morning Routine

Many people reach for a banana first thing in the morning, attracted to its natural sweetness, portability, and reputation as an effortless healthy choice. While it’s undeniably…

How Transparency in Process—not Full Disclosure—Builds Trust in the Courts

Public conversations about what courts choose to disclose and what they keep confidential often spark confusion. Many people assume that every redacted file or limited statement signals…

The Night I Discovered Our Faucets Weren’t Created Equal

For years, it felt like a harmless household habit: my husband would wake in the middle of the night, wander half-asleep to the bathroom, and drink straight…

The Quiet Neighbor Who Cherished What I Never Knew I Gave

For as long as I can remember, the woman on the eighth floor lived behind an air of quiet mystery. She rarely smiled, kept conversations brief, and…